• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log in
  • AMP
    • View AMP version
  • Edit Home Page
Close Menu
  • Home
  • Warka
  • News English
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Contact Us
  • About us
  • Authors
  • Privacy Policy
Categories
  • Authors
  • Awdal State
  • Business
  • Galmudug
  • Hirshabelle
  • legal opinion
  • News English
  • Opinion
  • Puntland
  • Somalia
  • Somaliland
  • SSC Khaatumo
  • Warka
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
  • Home
  • Warka
  • News English
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Contact Us
  • About us
  • Authors
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Qaran24 | Somali News – latest Update in Somalia & Quick News
HOT TOPICS
  • Warka
  • Opinion
  • News English
qaran24.com » Opinion » Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law

 

Dr Abdillahi Hashi Abib has once again taken to Twitter to claim that the Somali government’s actions constitute crimes against humanity under Article 7(1)(d) of the Rome Statute. This assertion is both legally flawed and reflects a personal grievance with the Somali government, undermining the credibility of his arguments

Somalia’s Non-Accession to the Rome Statute and Jurisdictional Constraints

Dr Abib calls on the ICC to intervene in Somalia, ignoring that Somalia is not a party to the Rome Statute. Somalia’s non-ratification means the ICC lacks automatic jurisdiction over crimes committed on its territory.

Under the Rome Statute, the ICC can only act with non-state parties under specific conditions, such as a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) referral or when a state voluntarily accepts the Court’s jurisdiction under Article 12(3). Neither of these conditions applies to Somalia.

By omitting this critical legal barrier, Dr Abib’s appeal is inherently flawed.

Misuse of Article 7(1)(d) of the Rome Statute

Dr Abib claims that “the forced displacement and demolition of homes affecting Somali families by government authorities constitute forcible transfer of population—acts that align with definitions of crimes against humanity.” However, his interpretation of Article 7(1)(d) is inaccurate and misleading.

Under Article 7(1)(d), forcible population transfer qualifies as a crime against humanity only if it is part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population with knowledge of the attack. This requires:

1. Intentional targeting of civilians.
2. A state or organisational policy designed to carry out such actions.
3. Evidence of a systematic or widespread practice.

The Somali government’s actions, including evictions and demolitions, fail to meet these criteria. These measures are better understood as responses to land disputes and urban development needs rooted in the aftermath of Somalia’s civil war.

During the conflict, many individuals and groups illegally occupied government-owned land, particularly in urban areas, without proper documentation or legal title. The government’s efforts to reclaim these lands are not systematic attacks but lawful actions aimed at restoring public property, resolving disputes, and ensuring equitable resource use.

Framing these actions as crimes against humanity not only lacks legal merit but also dangerously distorts the reality of Somalia’s governance challenges. Without clear evidence of a deliberate state policy to displace populations as part of a systematic attack, Dr Abib’s accusations are unfounded and inflammatory.

Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law

Political Motivation and Persistent Misrepresentation

Dr Abib’s repeated accusations against the Somali government stem from personal grievances rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. His pattern of publishing misleading claims portrays the government as an agent of crimes against humanity, raising questions about his motivations.

Instead of using his platform to engage in constructive parliamentary debate or propose meaningful reforms, Dr Abib escalates disputes on international platforms. This approach misleads the public, undermines trust in domestic governance, and hinders productive dialogue.

If Dr. Abib truly wishes to address forced evictions and governance challenges, he should focus on the tools provided by Somalia’s Constitution. Members of Parliament can propose laws, create commissions of inquiry, and collaborate with civil society to address pressing issues. Unfortunately, Dr Abib has consistently chosen rhetoric over action, further polarising public opinion.

Domestic Issues Do Not Automatically Constitute International Crimes

Forced displacement and home demolitions in Somalia are serious domestic issues tied to decades of weak governance, unresolved land ownership conflicts, and rapid urbanisation. These challenges demand domestic solutions tailored to Somalia’s unique context.

International law, including the Rome Statute, is not a tool for addressing governance shortcomings unless there is clear evidence of crimes meeting the threshold of widespread or systematic attacks. Dr Abib has provided no such evidence, making his appeal legally invalid and misleading.

Conclusion: Prioritizing Domestic Solutions Over Misleading Appeals

While Dr Abib’s concern for Somali civilians is commendable, his approach is counterproductive. Appeals to the ICC based on flawed legal interpretations misinform the public, undermine Somalia’s sovereignty, and distract from domestic efforts to rebuild institutions.

Somalia’s parliamentarians, including Dr Abib, are responsible for addressing human rights concerns through legislative action and policy reforms. Strengthening domestic systems, fostering constructive dialogue, and promoting equitable governance are the most effective ways to achieve justice and accountability.

The ICC is not a solution for every grievance. Its involvement is reserved for the gravest crimes meeting strict jurisdictional and evidentiary thresholds—standards Dr Abib’s appeal fails to meet. For Somalia to progress, its leaders must prioritize addressing the root causes of displacement, land disputes, and governance challenges, ensuring that justice begins at home.

 

Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Dr Abib’s Flawed Interpretation of International Law
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleStatement from the Ministry of Interior, Federal Affairs, and Reconciliation of the Federal Republic of Somalia
Next Article The Role of Oil Exploration in Somalia’s Economic Revival: Insights from Minister of Petroleum, H.E. Abdirisak Omar Mohamed
Qaran24
  • Website

Related Posts

ICG’s Blindfolded View of a Rising Somalia

18 October 2025

When Security Becomes a Political Weapon

14 October 2025

No Money, No Representation: Advocate Yabarow

13 October 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Somalia

ICG’s Blindfolded View of a Rising Somalia

Osman Omar18 October 2025

The latest report from the International Crisis Group reads less like research and more like…

BAASABOORKA DIBLOMAASIGA SOOMAALIYA HALIS AYAA KU JIRA — HAY’ADDA SOCDAALKA OO LOOGA DIGAY FARAGELIN SHARCI-DARRO AH

When Security Becomes a Political Weapon

No Money, No Representation: Advocate Yabarow

Seventeen Years of Silence: The Forgotten People of Jubaland

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
About Us
About Us

Qaran24 is is a reputable news website dedicated to providing accurate and timely information to its readers

Email Us: info@qaran24.com
Contact: +252-710000789

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
Titles
  • Authors
  • Awdal State
  • Business
  • Galmudug
  • Hirshabelle
  • legal opinion
  • News English
  • Opinion
  • Puntland
  • Somalia
  • Somaliland
  • SSC Khaatumo
  • Warka
Recent Post
  • ICG’s Blindfolded View of a Rising Somalia
  • BAASABOORKA DIBLOMAASIGA SOOMAALIYA HALIS AYAA KU JIRA — HAY’ADDA SOCDAALKA OO LOOGA DIGAY FARAGELIN SHARCI-DARRO AH
  • When Security Becomes a Political Weapon
  • No Money, No Representation: Advocate Yabarow
  • Seventeen Years of Silence: The Forgotten People of Jubaland

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.